A Costly Divorce Lesson, What I Missed Even with a Great Attorney By: Andrea DeLucia

I Had a Great Attorney and Still Learned a Costly Lesson

Educational information only, not legal or financial advice. Reading this does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Let me start with something most people don’t expect to hear. In my first divorce, I hired a very good attorney. I wasn’t unrepresented. I wasn’t careless. I had representation. And still, I made a financial decision that quietly followed me for years. Not because my attorney failed me, but because I didn’t fully understand what was worth negotiating for.

Who I Am (And Why This Matters)

I’m a retirement and financial professional. My work centers on helping people make decisions today that don’t undermine their financial security tomorrow. I’ve also lived through divorce more than once, which means I understand this process from both sides of the table, as a professional who sees long-term financial consequences play out, and as a person navigating one of life’s most emotional transitions. At its core, my work is about helping people move forward with confidence and a financial foundation that supports the life they’re rebuilding. 

The Choice That Felt Reasonable and Wasn’t

During my first divorce, there was company stock involved. At the time, I thought:
• “I don’t need the stock.”
• “I can deal with retirement assets later.”
• “I’ll focus on the house instead.”

It felt practical, clean, and mature. When we’re emotionally depleted, our brains look for relief. Behavioral psychology sometimes calls this cognitive offloading, we simplify decisions to reduce stress, often without realizing what we’re giving up. I wasn’t avoiding responsibility. I was avoiding exhaustion.

The Problem With “Later”

Here’s the part no one explains clearly enough, “later” is not neutral. Later can be costly. Stock, retirement accounts, and long-term compensation can:
• grow quietly
• benefit from time
• become harder (or sometimes impossible) to restructure after a settlement

What feels like a small concession in the moment can become a major imbalance over time. Once an agreement is signed, it is difficult to revisit simply because you later realize an asset mattered more than you thought.

Why Legal Guidance Can Still Be the Best Financial Move

Hiring a lawyer isn’t about being combative. It’s about being deliberate. A good attorney doesn’t just execute your wishes; they help you slow down and think through the long-term impact of what you’re agreeing to. They may ask:
• “Are you sure you don’t want to revisit this?”
• “Do you understand how this asset may behave over time?”
• “Have you considered the long-term income implications?”

In moments of emotional fatigue, that pushback isn’t friction. It can be protection.

As someone who plans retirement income for a living, I’ve learned that a lot of financial harm doesn’t come from markets alone. It can come from rushed decisions made during emotional transitions, and divorce is one of the most vulnerable of those moments.

The Simple Math That Changes Everything

This is a simplified illustration for educational purposes only, not a prediction of what will happen in any case.

Scenario One: You receive $2,500 a month for 20 years.

240 months × $2,500 = $600,000

Scenario Two: The agreement is structured differently, and you receive $5,000 a month for 15 years.

180 months × $5,000 = $900,000

That’s a $300,000 difference in this simplified example. The point is not the exact numbers. The point is that structure can matter as much as the asset itself, and it is worth understanding what you are trading. 

When You Might Not Need Full Legal Firepower

There are exceptions. If marriage is short, assets are minimal, there are no children, incomes are similar, and both parties are transparent, full-scale litigation may be unnecessary. Even then, limited legal guidance can help prevent avoidable mistakes. Simple does not mean inconsequential. 

The Mistake Most People Don’t Realize They’re Making

People assume the danger lies in fighting too hard. In reality, the greater risk can be not protecting the long-term picture enough. Saying:
• “That’s fine.”
• “I don’t need that.”
• “Let’s just move on.”

These statements feel calm and kind. They can also quietly shape your financial future. The law generally enforces what you sign. It does not protect you from being agreeable.

The Aha Moment (What I Wish Someone Had Said to Me)

Divorce isn’t only about dividing what you have today. It can also shape how you’ll live for years afterward. The role of an attorney isn’t to escalate conflict. It is to help make sure your future isn’t negotiated by exhaustion, guilt, fear, or the desire to be done.

The people who often feel most prepared are not the angriest. They are the most intentional, and intention often starts with the right information and the right guidance.

This article is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal or financial advice.

About the Author: Andrea DeLucia

Andrea DeLucia is a retirement and financial professional who helps individuals understand the long-term financial impact of divorce and major life transitions. Guest contributor content is provided for general educational purposes and does not constitute legal or financial advice. 

Connect with Andrea DeLucia: http://www.lifefuturewealth.org

Email: andrea@lifefuture.org

Related resources from Triangle Divorce Lawyers (North Carolina):

If you are navigating divorce, custody, support, or a separation agreement in North Carolina and want to talk through next steps, you can schedule a confidential meeting with our team or call 919-303-2020. Triangle Divorce Lawyers serves clients in Raleigh, Cary, Wake Forest, Clayton, and surrounding communities.

Categories

Protect Your Assets
and Your Future

Get case review

Request a Callback

Submit a form below and we will contact you within 24 hours.